OwlMem
Compare

OwlMem vs Letta

Letta, formerly MemGPT, is a framework for stateful agents that manage their own memory. OwlMem is shared memory for the agents you already use.

Facts checked against each vendor's public docs and pricing pages on October 25, 2026. Features and prices change; if we got something wrong, email [email protected] and we'll fix it.

At a glance

OwlMem vs Letta
FeatureOwlMemLetta
What it isHosted service for teams: knowledge base, memory and vaultFramework for stateful agents (formerly MemGPT)
MCPYes: Hosted MCP server with OAuth sign-inPartly: Hosted MCP to create and message Letta agents
Shared across AI appsYes: Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Codex, Gemini, any MCP clientNot published: Not documented for other AI apps
Team sharingYes: Organizations, members, one identity per AIYes: Teams plan; shared memory repositories (cloud)
How data is storedMarkdown in git, plus facts recalled by meaningGit-backed memory files plus a vector archive
Audit and rollbackYes: Every write is a git commit: diff, revert, exportYes: Every memory change is a git commit
Self-host / open sourceNo: No, managed only (servers in Canada); CLI is MITYes: Yes, Apache-2.0
Secrets vault for agentsYes: End-to-end encrypted vault, approval per usePartly: Per-agent tool secrets (environment variables)
Extracts memories automaticallyNo: No, agents save lessons and facts on purposeYes: Yes, the agent edits its own memory
Starting priceFree for 1 AI agent; from $19/monthFree tier; from $20/month

Key differences

  • Agents or memory. Letta is where you build and run agents, and memory belongs to those agents. OwlMem is only the shared layer: Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Codex and others keep working as they are and connect to it over MCP.
  • Both use git. Letta's memory filesystem commits every memory change to git, and OwlMem commits every knowledge-base write to git. In both, history is readable and reversible.
  • MCP. Letta's hosted MCP server lets other clients create and message Letta agents. OwlMem's MCP server gives any client direct tools to search, write and recall shared memory.
  • Self-hosting. Letta is open source (Apache-2.0) and runs locally. OwlMem is managed only.

Which one to choose

Letta

Choose Letta if you are building long-running, stateful agents that manage and rewrite their own memory, and you want an open-source framework you can self-host.

Choose OwlMem if you want the agents you already use to share one memory and knowledge base, instead of building new agents on a framework.

Using both, or moving over

If your Letta agents can use MCP tools, they can connect to OwlMem like any other client, so your Letta agents and your everyday AI apps read the same knowledge base. Credentials can live in the OwlMem vault instead of in each agent's settings.

Questions

Is Letta the same as MemGPT?

Yes. Letta grew out of the MemGPT research project. It now focuses on Letta Code, an agent harness with persistent memory, and the Letta API.

Do I need to build agents to use OwlMem?

No. OwlMem works with the AI apps you already have — Claude, ChatGPT, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI and any MCP client. Tell your AI to read https://mcp.owlmem.com and it sets itself up.

How do the prices compare?

As of October 2026, Letta has a free tier and paid plans from $20 a month, with Teams Pro at $20 per seat a month. OwlMem is free for one AI agent and from $19 a month, counted per AI agent rather than per person. See pricing.

Sources

Official pages we checked on October 25, 2026:

All comparisons →

Give every AI on your team one memory

Free for one AI, forever. Connect Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or Codex in a minute.